Academy players at 'an all time low'

by **Sandie** Tue Nov 10, 2015 3:06 pm

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/34767964

Premier League club-trained players at new low, study says

The percentage of club-trained players in Premier League squads has reached a new low, a study says.

Research by the CIES Football Observatory found 11.7% of top-flight players graduated from their club's academy, down from 13.8% last year.

Across 31 top European divisions the figure has dropped below 20% for the first time since figures began in 2009.

Clubs are "increasingly reluctant" to give chances to academy players, says study author Raffaele Poli.

A club-trained player has spent at least three seasons between the ages of 15 and 21 training with their current side.

Overseas players account for 59.9% of Premier League footballers, the second-highest figure in Europe behind Cyprus.

That is higher than all other so-called 'big-five' nations - Italy (56.5%), Germany (45.9%), Spain (39.9%) and France (30.5%).

In addition, 41.1% of Premier League players are internationals, eclipsing 30.9% in Germany's Bundesliga and 19.9% in Spain's La Liga.

"The average age of footballers in Europe has reached a new high of 26 years," Poli says.

The average age of a Premier League player has never been higher at 26.9 years, but has remained relatively stable since an average of 26.7 in 2009.

Spurs set the standard
The introduction of the Premier League's £320m elite player performance plan (EPPP) in 2012 was designed to try to improve the quality of young English players and increase their opportunities in first teams.

But an increase in the percentage of foreign players over the past three years means that many youngsters now need to transfer clubs or go out on loan before playing in the Premier League.

Tottenham have the Premier League's largest percentage of club-trained players in their squad at 32%. Three Spurs players - striker Harry Kane, midfielder Ryan Mason and winger Andros Townsend - all went on loan before making their first-team breakthroughs and have since played for England.

Arsenal are second with 24%, Manchester United third with 20%, while Swansea City and Bournemouth have no club-trained players, according to the study.

The percentage of foreign players at Chelsea - 83.3% - is the third-highest in Europe and 12.5% of their squad is club-trained. That includes 19-year-old midfielder Ruben Loftus-Cheek.

The Premier League said 31 home-grown players had made their debuts this season, but recognised they had come through a variety of routes.

It added: "The number one stated aim of the EPPP is to develop more and better home-grown players capable of playing at Premier League level. English clubs are absolutely committed to this.

"For some players, like Manchester City's Raheem Sterling, they go straight from academy to under-21 football and then to the Premier League. For others, like Kane and Manchester United's Jesse Lingard, it was hard work at their academies, combined with U21 football and loans to the Football League prior to making an impact in the Premier League."

Is it getting worse for Premier League youngsters?
The Football Association has outlined plans to try to boost the number of home-grown players in England by limiting the number of non-EU players.

But Premier League clubs spent a record £1bn on transfer fees in 2015 with 65% of that paid to overseas clubs for players.

Manchester United set a world record fee for a teenager when they paid £36m to Monaco for 19-year-old striker Anthony Martial and from next season clubs will receive a further injection of money when a new £5.14bn TV deal kicks in for three years.

CIES Football Observatory data shows that the percentage of association-trained players in the Premier League - those who have come through a club's academy but now play for a different team - has dropped from 51% last year to 47.6%, but is above the lowest figure - 47.1% - set in 2013.

Poli added: "Although no-one would contest that youth is the future of football, the study shows that top-division European clubs are less and less courageous when it comes to giving club-trained players a chance to prove themselves."

But the Premier League said: "With the likes of Sunderland's Duncan Watmore, West Ham's Reece Oxford and Tottenham's Joshua Onumah recently making Premier League debuts, the belief is that the foundations that the EPPP has been laying since 2012 will continue to produce and progress talent in growing numbers."

European football's governing body Uefa, which ensures that at least eight association trained-players are in squads for competitions such as the Champions League, told BBC Sport: "Uefa believes that the issue of locally-trained players is very important for the development of football at all levels."

Other insights from the CIES report taken from Europe's 31 top leagues show:
• The highest percentage of club-trained players in a current squad is at Belarusian side FC Gomel, standing at 91.7%. Spain's Athletic Bilbao is fourth at 63%.

• Slovenian side Zavrc have the highest percentage of foreign players in their squad at 88%, with Italy's Roma second at 85.2% before Chelsea in third at 83.3%.

• Italian side Chievo are the only club whose average player age is over 30. Stoke are the Premier League's eldest team at 28.7 years old.

• Manchester United's Champions League group opponents Wolfsburg have the tallest team in Europe, averaging at 187cm or 6ft 2in. Stoke are the Premier League's tallest team.

• Premier League players have been at their clubs for the longest time, at an average of 2.82 years. The longest average stay is at Everton - 4.14 years.

Very interesting read (for me at least, maybe not the rest of you). I was thinking we'd be one of the teams doing really well for bringing youth through and we're 4th for 'club trained players' but they make up only 18.5% of our squad, somewhat far below what Spurs are doing. Someone on here made the point that our adoption of our moneyball transfer policy might signal the start of a decline of our use of academy players in favour of bringing in young and good value foreign players. I think with the huge TV deals meaning Premier League clubs are cash rich increases that. Suddenly clubs like ourselves and Stoke are able to give big wages and transfer fees for foreign prospects. That's why Stoke have been able to raid Barcelona for youth players not quite good enough for the Barcelona first team. That's why we've got in the likes of Amavi and Adama Traore who are seen as really bright players.

Is this a bad thing, some might ask? Why should Villa develop young English players for the national team when the only thing the national team has done for us in recent seasons is to be the precursor to snake-like behaviour from the likes of Delph? Well, a club-trained academy player is not necessarily an English one and it's one less transfer fee to be paid if they make the first team. But maybe the question should not be are the Premiership clubs failing young players but are the academies failing the clubs?

by **villabromsgrove** Tue Nov 10, 2015 3:29 pm

I think the time has come for Academies to wave the white flag of surrender and admit that they have a very limited low key future. The last straw for me was when Arsenal snatched Daniel Crowley for pennies two years ago. What is the point of developing exceptional players if you haven't a cat in hells chance of keeping them, or at least making a very good profit on your investment?

The people who run football haven't got the slightest intention of protecting the rights of 'parent' clubs! It's designed to be a poacher's free for all, benefitting the richest clubs.

by **Sandie** Tue Nov 10, 2015 3:38 pm

villabromsgrove wrote:The last straw for me was when Arsenal snatched Daniel Crowley for pennies two years ago. What is the point of developing exceptional players if you haven't a cat in hells chance of keeping them, or at least making a very good profit on your investment?

And what will be his chances of making an impact for Arsenal? Most likely he'll end up failing to break through then will end up making his name at a smaller premier league club (if he's lucky) like a Swansea or even a Villa!

Having looked it up, we got £209,000 for him because he was under 16. And that's probably one of the best prospects we had coming through in recent seasons.

by **villabromsgrove** Wed Nov 11, 2015 8:42 am

Sandie wrote:
villabromsgrove wrote:The last straw for me was when Arsenal snatched Daniel Crowley for pennies two years ago. What is the point of developing exceptional players if you haven't a cat in hells chance of keeping them, or at least making a very good profit on your investment?

And what will be his chances of making an impact for Arsenal? Most likely he'll end up failing to break through then will end up making his name at a smaller premier league club (if he's lucky) like a Swansea or even a Villa!

Having looked it up, we got £209,000 for him because he was under 16. And that's probably one of the best prospects we had coming through in recent seasons.

I think Daniel Crowley will become a big player. He's already captain of the U18's and he regularly scores and assists as well as running midfield. That's no mean feat at Arsenal. Crowley will possibly become a multi million pound player if he avoids serious injury, and Villa have been paid peanuts for a player who you rightly say Sandie is our best prospect in years.

by **villabromsgrove** Fri Nov 20, 2015 11:25 am

It's good to see Easah Suliman winning an award for young Asian player of the year. I rate him, problem is so do a lot of people. I wonder whether we'll manage to hold on to him?

http://www.avfc.co.uk/page/NewsDetail/0,,10265~5152996,00.html

by Sponsored content

Academy players at 'an all time low'

Academy players at 'an all time low'

Re: Academy players at 'an all time low'

Re: Academy players at 'an all time low'

Re: Academy players at 'an all time low'

Re: Academy players at 'an all time low'

Re: Academy players at 'an all time low'